Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com>
Cc: andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy
Date: 2024-12-16 02:25:16
Message-ID: Z1-PjE6KPimF8w55@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 04:46:57PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Note that using "test" as table name for the tests is not a good idea,
> as this could very likely conflict with some concurrent activity. I
> would also add two RESET queries to remove the dependency to
> client_encoding once the test has no need to rely on it. No need to
> send a new patch for all that, just noticing in passing.

I got some time to look again at this one. Applied with the tweaks
for the table name and the two RESET queries.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sutou Kouhei 2024-12-16 02:39:58 Re: confusing / inefficient "need_transcoding" handling in copy
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-12-15 22:18:39 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER