Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 15:42:16
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.44.0301131040170.39187-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu]
> > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
> > To: Vince Vielhaber
> > Cc: Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
> >
> >
> > And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?)
> > indicating that the bandwidth was down in the noise for them
> > (as an ISP).
>
> I think that was Vince talking about 1 mirror. The January stats to date
> (bear in mind it didn't go live until the 4/5th Jan), for the Portal and
> idocs *only* (ie, not including gborg, techdocs, developer, user-lounge,
> archives, fts, pgadmin, odbc, jdbc or ftp) are:
>
> Total Hits 1339547
> Total Files 1064536
> Total Pages 324346
> Total Visits 58178
> Total KBytes 2712883
>
> In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
>
> I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)

It's irrelevant. The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored and the
question was about mirrors.

Vince.
--
Fast, inexpensive internet service 56k and beyond! http://www.pop4.net/
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-01-13 15:47:59 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-01-13 15:32:08 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?