Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 15:47:59
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8856E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > Total Hits 1339547
> > Total Files 1064536
> > Total Pages 324346
> > Total Visits 58178
> > Total KBytes 2712883
> >
> > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
> >
> > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
>
> It's irrelevant. The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored
> and the question was about mirrors.

It's not irrelevant. The original question was a complaint about the ads
and why we have them - this shows the amount of traffic we get for a
small portion of the site which can give some idea how busy other bits
of the sites might get.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joerg Hessdoerfer 2003-01-13 15:56:01 \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-13 15:42:16 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?