Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 10:47, Dave Page wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> > Sent: 13 January 2003 15:42
> > To: Dave Page
> > Cc: Ross J. Reedstrom; Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
> > >
> > > Total Hits 1339547
> > > Total Files 1064536
> > > Total Pages 324346
> > > Total Visits 58178
> > > Total KBytes 2712883
> > >
> > > In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)
> >
> > It's irrelevant. The portal and idocs aren't being mirrored
> > and the question was about mirrors.
>
> It's not irrelevant. The original question was a complaint about the ads
> and why we have them - this shows the amount of traffic we get for a
> small portion of the site which can give some idea how busy other bits
> of the sites might get.
>

Perhaps this means we need to put more focus in finding ways to get
other parts of the site mirrored.

Robert Treat