Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 16:40:32
Message-ID: b6f8aaff1767dd88bb2516a28ab3520b@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

> Go back and reread the end of it. The first part was about the ads,
> the second was about mirrors.

Sorry for the confusion: Dave is right, I just asked the question wrong.
I am not really concerned about the mirrors, but how much traffic the
main portal endures, and if that number justifies the putting of
advertisements on the site.

The answer to the first appears to be about 320 MB per day, or about
9 gigs per month. Not too shabby, but not too bad either. To be
totally fair, we should also factor in all the other sites (subdomains)
that hub.org is providing.

I see the big questions as:

What prompted the redesign to put the ads on every page of the site,
when before they were only on the opening "flags" page?

How much monthly revenue do the ads bring in, and can we (the community)
provide an alternative to this income, perhaps via direct contributions?

--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200301131149

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+Iu5+vJuQZxSWSsgRAjkSAJ9Yit8t0GIwigsdf5DZtDVA71vZCgCgz29S
kgC4JGdxFigBpjaHH9KFnaA=
=z1RC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-01-13 16:44:41 Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
Previous Message greg 2003-01-13 16:28:06 Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?