Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: \d type queries - why not views in system catalog?!?
Date: 2003-01-13 16:44:41
Message-ID: 1042476281.66924.9.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 11:28, greg(at)turnstep(dot)com wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
>
>
> > Wouldn't it be easier (and more portable, see 7.3/7.2 system catalogs vs.
> > psql) to have views for that? Do I miss a point here?
>
> Putting the \d commands into views has been on the TODO list for a long time:
> I think it is actually the only psql-related item left, until we change
> the backend protocol to indicate transaction state. I don't think a view
> would have helped with the psql 7.2/7.3 change: a lot more changed than
> simply the underlying SQL.

It would be a wise idea to use the INFORMATION_SCHEMA where possible for
these, as that is pretty much guaranteed to be static in format.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2003-01-13 18:01:49 Re: pg_get_constraintdef
Previous Message greg 2003-01-13 16:40:32 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?