Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-13 15:32:08
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8856D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu]
> Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
> To: Vince Vielhaber
> Cc: Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
>
>
> And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?)
> indicating that the bandwidth was down in the noise for them
> (as an ISP).

I think that was Vince talking about 1 mirror. The January stats to date
(bear in mind it didn't go live until the 4/5th Jan), for the Portal and
idocs *only* (ie, not including gborg, techdocs, developer, user-lounge,
archives, fts, pgadmin, odbc, jdbc or ftp) are:

Total Hits 1339547
Total Files 1064536
Total Pages 324346
Total Visits 58178
Total KBytes 2712883

In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.

I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-13 15:42:16 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-13 15:22:21 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?