Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c
Date: 2024-11-05 21:08:33
Message-ID: D5B5B226-1EA5-4831-ACF2-919F14CE27AA@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Nov 2024, at 17:40, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2024/09/24 21:31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 24 Sep 2024, at 10:32, btnakamurakoukil <btnakamurakoukil(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I noticed unnecessary variable "low" in index_delete_sort() (/postgres/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c), patch attached. What do you think?
>> That variable does indeed seem to not be used, and hasn't been used since it
>> was committed in d168b666823. The question is if it's a left-over from
>> development which can be removed, or if it should be set and we're missing an
>> optimization. Having not read the referenced paper I can't tell so adding
>> Peter Geoghegan who wrote this for clarification.
>
> It's been about a month without updates. How about removing the unnecessary
> variable as suggested? We can always add the "missing" logic later if needed.

Thanks for reviving this, I had admittedly forgotten about this thread. I
don't see any reason to not go ahead with the proposed diff.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-11-05 21:55:16 Re: pg_dump --no-comments confusion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-11-05 21:06:05 Re: [BUG] Fix DETACH with FK pointing to a partitioned table fails