From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Subject: | Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c |
Date: | 2024-11-06 14:29:59 |
Message-ID: | D338EFA5-CECB-4D42-8950-625CA4B2BF7C@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 5 Nov 2024, at 22:08, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Nov 2024, at 17:40, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2024/09/24 21:31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>>> On 24 Sep 2024, at 10:32, btnakamurakoukil <btnakamurakoukil(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I noticed unnecessary variable "low" in index_delete_sort() (/postgres/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c), patch attached. What do you think?
>>> That variable does indeed seem to not be used, and hasn't been used since it
>>> was committed in d168b666823. The question is if it's a left-over from
>>> development which can be removed, or if it should be set and we're missing an
>>> optimization. Having not read the referenced paper I can't tell so adding
>>> Peter Geoghegan who wrote this for clarification.
>>
>> It's been about a month without updates. How about removing the unnecessary
>> variable as suggested? We can always add the "missing" logic later if needed.
>
> Thanks for reviving this, I had admittedly forgotten about this thread. I
> don't see any reason to not go ahead with the proposed diff.
Done now.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-11-06 14:43:27 | Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-11-06 14:06:36 | Re: Inconsistent RestrictInfo serial numbers |