Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: index_delete_sort: Unnecessary variable "low" is used in heapam.c
Date: 2024-11-05 16:40:17
Message-ID: 25db2687-6ed4-4d97-a875-bba9f8021eca@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/09/24 21:31, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 24 Sep 2024, at 10:32, btnakamurakoukil <btnakamurakoukil(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I noticed unnecessary variable "low" in index_delete_sort() (/postgres/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c), patch attached. What do you think?
>
> That variable does indeed seem to not be used, and hasn't been used since it
> was committed in d168b666823. The question is if it's a left-over from
> development which can be removed, or if it should be set and we're missing an
> optimization. Having not read the referenced paper I can't tell so adding
> Peter Geoghegan who wrote this for clarification.

It's been about a month without updates. How about removing the unnecessary
variable as suggested? We can always add the "missing" logic later if needed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-11-05 17:30:42 meson vs. extension builds
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-11-05 16:21:42 Re: Virtual generated columns