Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-02-13 21:23:01
Message-ID: CAOYmi+mi3u0CvjUJuAV2UBvJECO7=zUaUquMe6Z-tK0n4FDynA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:55 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> This just depends on how people have built their libcurl, right?
>
> Do we have any information whether the async-dns-free build is a common
> configuration?

I don't think the annual Curl survey covers that, unfortunately.

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:59 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> I think you can just remove that comment. It's pretty established that
> internal errors don't need translation, so it would be understood from
> looking at the code.

Okay, will do.

Thanks,
--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-02-13 21:35:55 Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-02-13 20:59:06 Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock