Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-02-13 23:01:07
Message-ID: C66FCE80-EB6A-4A1E-B919-D2DE72E0E3C0@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 13 Feb 2025, at 22:23, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:55 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> This just depends on how people have built their libcurl, right?
>>
>> Do we have any information whether the async-dns-free build is a common
>> configuration?
>
> I don't think the annual Curl survey covers that, unfortunately.

We should be able to get a decent idea by inspecting the packaging scripts for
the major distributions I think.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-02-13 23:01:59 Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-02-13 22:56:29 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER