Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-02-12 14:59:11
Message-ID: 25b978e4-6be9-4c83-989b-574e5e79b276@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08.02.25 02:56, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> + oauth_json_set_error(ctx, /* don't bother translating */
>> With the project style format for translator comments this should be:
>>
>> + /* translator: xxx */
>> + oauth_json_set_error(ctx,
> This comment was just meant to draw attention to the lack of
> libpq_gettext(). Does it still need a translator note if we don't run
> it through translation?

No, that wouldn't have any effect.

I think you can just remove that comment. It's pretty established that
internal errors don't need translation, so it would be understood from
looking at the code.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-02-12 15:23:36 Re: SQL:2011 application time
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2025-02-12 14:59:08 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes