Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes
Date: 2025-02-13 21:35:55
Message-ID: Z65lu3wzWTi7JziC@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:59:45PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> I noticed the pg_sequences system-view DOCS page [1] has a note about
> the 'last_value' field. But the note is not within the row for that
> field. Indeed, it is not even within the table.
>
> Is it deliberate? Apparently, this changed in commit 3cb2f13 [2], so
> CC-ing author Nathan.

Yes, this was intentional. I felt this was too much information to squeeze
into the table, and so I followed the example of pg_user_mappings [0] and
placed it below.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/view-pg-user-mappings.html

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-02-13 21:38:36 Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c)
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-02-13 21:23:01 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER