| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS - Question about pg_sequences.last_value notes |
| Date: | 2025-02-14 01:23:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+Pv52ReaYQpMgipzF4tD4AXD-ypQP4CJ8VbzkqMbZaz2EA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:35 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:59:45PM +1100, Peter Smith wrote:
> > I noticed the pg_sequences system-view DOCS page [1] has a note about
> > the 'last_value' field. But the note is not within the row for that
> > field. Indeed, it is not even within the table.
> >
> > Is it deliberate? Apparently, this changed in commit 3cb2f13 [2], so
> > CC-ing author Nathan.
>
> Yes, this was intentional. I felt this was too much information to squeeze
> into the table, and so I followed the example of pg_user_mappings [0] and
> placed it below.
>
> [0] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/view-pg-user-mappings.html
>
OK. Thanks for the explanation.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-02-14 01:29:43 | Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip |
| Previous Message | Andrew Atkinson | 2025-02-14 01:04:46 | Re: DROP CONSTRAINT, printing a notice and/or skipping when no action is taken |