From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sbob <sbob(at)quadratum-braccas(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgpool not load balancing via foreign table |
Date: | 2024-06-22 05:12:54 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYBfMO--vVW+eiuOn7bSxa3OkDO=fTUZs+2B7-pt1ranA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Friday, June 21, 2024, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Friday, June 21, 2024, Sbob <sbob(at)quadratum-braccas(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> however no matter how many selects I run via the foreign tables a "show
>> pool_nodes" on the pgpool server shows a select_cnt of 0 for all 3 nodes.
>>
>> If I connect to the pgpool server/cluster and run a number of select
>> statements then a "show pool_nodes" shows increasing values for all 3
>> backend nodes for select_cnt
>>
>>
>> It appears that a foreign table / FDW connection to a pgpool node does
>> not trigger the collection of any load balancing stats
>>
>>
> Skimming over the project and the extension (for the first time ever…) it
> seems pgpool only does stats in response to Execute messages while FDW is
> using the simple query protocol. That pgpool doesn’t do stats for Query as
> well seems like an oversight.
>
Nevermind…or at least while possible further reading of the pgpool code
doesn’t support it - the simple query case is present.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Veerendra Pulapa | 2024-06-22 06:38:22 | Re: Urgent: Segmentation Fault in PostgreSQL postmaster Process |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-06-22 05:05:04 | Re: pgpool not load balancing via foreign table |