Re: Call for feedback on pgAdmin4 features

Hi jbiskofski,

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:45 AM, jbiskofski <jbiskofski(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> We use PGADMIN4 heavily in my place of work. We use it, so tech support
> can connect to different postgres instances of our customers. We made some
> modifications ( unfortunately we didnt make them in a configurable way, its
> all hard-coded )
>
We're trying to fix the encoding issue at our end, but - we (Developer at
EnterpriseDB) are mostly uses English as our base language.

Can you please share the changes with us?
Or, please publish your repository on github.

>
> 1. Currently the encoding is hard-set to utf8, we changed it to latin9.
> 2. Have a type of user that cant register/delete servers/databases. They
> should see a predefined list that they cannot modify, additionally we
> modified pgadmin so these users cant drop/create databases/users, etc.
>
3. Add a comment to the top of all outgoing queries performed by pg admin
> so postgres logs what pgadmin user performed the action - this is super
> useful because this way we dont need to add postgres users to all the
> servers, the comment is something like -- PGADMIN : $USERNAME --
>
> 4. I feel like the connection reutlization thing is kinda flaky, We get a
> lot of "prerequisite error" stuff in the browser, we deal with it by
> refreshing the browser.
> 5. Add support for having some other caching server ( nginx ) in front of
> apache. We were able to get this to work with a bunch of rewrite/retry cfg
> in nginx, but it was tricky.
>

> pgadmin4 is awesome - we love it! great work
>

Your changes may help us understand us the problem in real world.

Let's make it better together!

--
Thanks & Regards,

Ashesh Vashi

>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Anthony DeBarros <adebarros(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'd be very interested in contributing, but my days are pretty consumed
>> with my day job. Let me know what kind of flexibility you have.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Shirley Wang <swang(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>
>>> It'll be a 1 on 1 conversation. We're avoiding webinar type
>>> presentations so we can get your feedback directly without bias.
>>>
>>> I'm sending you another email directly to figure out details now!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:38 PM Adam Brusselback <
>>> adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Shirley,
>>>>
>>>> The conversation will take about an hour, although if you have time
>>>> constraints but would still like to chat, let us know and we can
>>>> accommodate. If you're interested, please respond to this thread with some
>>>> dates and times and we'll follow up shortly.
>>>>
>>>> Just wondering, are you planning on doing a webinar type presentation
>>>> while asking for feedback while it's going (so you can show a bunch of
>>>> people at once)? Or are you planning on doing 1 on 1 conversations?
>>>>
>>>> I'd be interested, either way. I don't have anything blocked out on my
>>>> calendar for Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday of next week.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Adam
>>>>
>>>
>>
>