Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: tender wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock
Date: 2023-12-11 05:11:47
Message-ID: CAFiTN-vKDg1UeuxmfAtmyXMT-du5SDLkaZhugak74yFJ1pqrDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 3:30 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:58 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

Here is the updated patch based on some comments by tender wang (those
comments were sent only to me)

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0002-Divide-SLRU-buffers-into-banks.patch application/octet-stream 13.6 KB
v10-0003-Remove-the-centralized-control-lock-and-LRU-coun.patch application/octet-stream 74.3 KB
v10-0001-Make-all-SLRU-buffer-sizes-configurable.patch application/octet-stream 23.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2023-12-11 05:39:45 Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Previous Message Richard Guo 2023-12-11 03:02:24 Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash