Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:58 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 3:29 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-Nov-29, tender wang wrote:
> >
> > > The v8-0001 patch failed to apply in my local repo as below:
> > >
> > > git apply v8-0001-Make-all-SLRU-buffer-sizes-configurable.patch
> > > error: patch failed: src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c:1851
> > > error: src/backend/access/transam/multixact.c: patch does not apply
> > > error: patch failed: src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c:184
> > > error: src/backend/access/transam/subtrans.c: patch does not apply
> > > error: patch failed: src/backend/commands/async.c:117
> > > error: src/backend/commands/async.c: patch does not apply
> > > error: patch failed: src/backend/storage/lmgr/predicate.c:808
> > > error: src/backend/storage/lmgr/predicate.c: patch does not apply
> > > error: patch failed: src/include/commands/async.h:15
> > > error: src/include/commands/async.h: patch does not apply
> >
> > Yeah, this patch series conflicts with today's commit 4ed8f0913bfd.
>
> I will send a rebased version by tomorrow.

PFA, a rebased version of the patch, I have avoided attaching because
a) that patch is POC to show the coverage and it has a dependency on
the other thread b) the old patch still applies so it doesn't need
rebase.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com