| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Date: | 2014-05-10 22:19:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcNs+qgB+OLrrkuMqwR0=Egfj1hyXNFKs2Qg5-MDrLNEkayRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I don't even understand why it's questionable whether this should be
> > fixed.
>
> Sigh. We have some debate isomorphic to this one every year, it seems
> like. The argument why it shouldn't be fixed now is: ITS. TOO. LATE.
> Which part of that isn't clear to you?
>
Sorry but I don't understand why it's too late. The 9.4 branch not been
created yet.
And in the last hours various patches (mostly fixes) have been committed
and IMO this is not different.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-10 22:27:13 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-10 22:16:19 | Re: min_recovery_apply_delay |