| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: min_recovery_apply_delay |
| Date: | 2014-05-10 22:16:19 |
| Message-ID: | 21111.1399760179@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fabrzio de Royes Mello
>> <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay?
>>> +1
>> Works for me.
> Done!!
Since there were no objections, and time is growing (very) short,
I'm going to go ahead and push this in. It looks safe enough for
a last-minute change.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-05-10 22:19:22 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-05-10 21:56:23 | Re: min_recovery_apply_delay |