| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Date: | 2014-05-10 22:27:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20140510222713.GF16507@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-05-10 19:19:22 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > I don't even understand why it's questionable whether this should be
> > > fixed.
> >
> > Sigh. We have some debate isomorphic to this one every year, it seems
> > like. The argument why it shouldn't be fixed now is: ITS. TOO. LATE.
> > Which part of that isn't clear to you?
> >
>
> Sorry but I don't understand why it's too late. The 9.4 branch not been
> created yet.
The problem is that once the beta is in progress (starting tomorrow),
the projects tries to avoid changes which require a dump and restore (or
pg_upgrade). Since the patch changes the catalog it'd require that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-05-10 22:31:09 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-05-10 22:19:22 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |