From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Date: | 2014-05-10 22:37:17 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+rA3d2ZBZw0O3qN9KvZwG6xZ+33tqiQT_j4brr9LDezXw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On 2014-05-10 19:19:22 -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > >
> > > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > > I don't even understand why it's questionable whether this should be
> > > > fixed.
> > >
> > > Sigh. We have some debate isomorphic to this one every year, it seems
> > > like. The argument why it shouldn't be fixed now is: ITS. TOO. LATE.
> > > Which part of that isn't clear to you?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry but I don't understand why it's too late. The 9.4 branch not been
> > created yet.
>
> The problem is that once the beta is in progress (starting tomorrow),
> the projects tries to avoid changes which require a dump and restore (or
> pg_upgrade). Since the patch changes the catalog it'd require that.
>
Hmmmm... so the other option maybe is create an extension to add this
operators.
Thoughts?
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-05-10 22:39:44 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-05-10 22:34:51 | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |