Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey

Hello,

I didn't submit it as a poll because If we submit it as planned, and only
provide a link for the interoperability option, that may show we are not
treating the other options as serious, and/or will ignore them. The post
may possibly get flagged as the community prefers more forthcoming posts.
That is why I recommend restructuring it as a poll.

Thanks,
Sumedh

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <
tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:

> Hello, Sumedh,
>
>
>
> We’re having the Golden Week holiday from April 29 to May 8 here in Japan,
> and I can’t read the mails to this address. Instead, I’m ccing this mail
> to my Gmail address, which I can use during the holiday. So please “reply
> to all” when replying.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:
> pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] *On Behalf Of *Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:10 PM
> *To:* Sumedh Pathak; Justin Clift
> *Cc:* Umur Cubukcu; David Fetter; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> *Subject:* Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please take part in the PostgreSQL
> ecosystem survey
>
>
>
> *From:* pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [
> mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>] *On Behalf Of *Sumedh Pathak
> Yeah, it didn't really pick up. Ultimately, I think such types of requests
> are best asked in 'poll' form. The best option might be to restructure this
> so it can be submitted as a 'poll'.
>
>
>
>
>
> I misunderstood that your post was a poll. Do you mean your previous post
> was an "Ask" article and so it didn't get attention as we were afraid?
>
>
>
> Then, could you again take the trouble to re-post it as a "poll"? That
> is, posting one greeting (dummy) question and guide respondents to the
> original mailing list article like the following example. The below is
> just an example; any better guiding question would be OK. I'd like to
> avoid restructure and scatter the responses as much as possible...
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Q: Please select items which you think are necessary for PostgreSQL to
> improve. You can select multiple choices.
>
>
>
> 1.Functionality
>
> 2.Performance
>
> 3.Quality
>
> Interoperability with other software
>
> 4.Scalability
>
> 5.Availability
>
> 6.Manageability
>
>
>
> If you chose interoperability, please let us know the details by
> responding the following poll.
>
>
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1
>
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Takayuki Tsunakawa
>
>
>
>
>

--
*Sumedh Pathak*
Citus Data
650.422.9797
sumedh(at)citusdata(dot)com