From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sumedh Pathak <sumedh(at)citusdata(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Umur Cubukcu <umur(at)citusdata(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com" <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey |
Date: | 2016-04-28 05:32:56 |
Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F56E888@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hello, Sumedh,
We’re having the Golden Week holiday from April 29 to May 8 here in Japan, and I can’t read the mails to this address. Instead, I’m ccing this mail to my Gmail address, which I can use during the holiday. So please “reply to all” when replying.
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:10 PM
To: Sumedh Pathak; Justin Clift
Cc: Umur Cubukcu; David Fetter; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org<mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org> [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Sumedh Pathak
Yeah, it didn't really pick up. Ultimately, I think such types of requests are best asked in 'poll' form. The best option might be to restructure this so it can be submitted as a 'poll'.
I misunderstood that your post was a poll. Do you mean your previous post was an "Ask" article and so it didn't get attention as we were afraid?
Then, could you again take the trouble to re-post it as a "poll"? That is, posting one greeting (dummy) question and guide respondents to the original mailing list article like the following example. The below is just an example; any better guiding question would be OK. I'd like to avoid restructure and scatter the responses as much as possible...
--------------------------------------------------
Q: Please select items which you think are necessary for PostgreSQL to improve. You can select multiple choices.
1.Functionality
2.Performance
3.Quality
Interoperability with other software
4.Scalability
5.Availability
6.Manageability
If you chose interoperability, please let us know the details by responding the following poll.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1
-------------------------------------------------
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-04-29 11:14:22 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2016-04-28 04:40:03 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |