| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
| Date: | 2016-04-28 04:40:03 |
| Message-ID: | 57219423.3030601@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/27/2016 01:50 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
>> On 04/27/2016 09:40 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
>>
>>> If it weren't for length, I'd be all for having a list of projects which
>>> are having a release to get ready for 9.6; we've done that several times
>>> before, and that's useful for testing too. "pgAdmin has been adjusted
>>> to support X in the new release, please test". I don't know that we
>>> have anything like that, though, do we?
>>
>> The only thing would be PgLogical but I don't think it warrants exclusivity.
>
> Not entirely sure I'm following along correctly, but if we're talking
> about tools being updated for 9.6, it seems likley that all of the
> backup tools which use pg_start/stop_backup will be updated for the new
> API.
Damn, which means I need to test mine too. Where are these changes
documented?
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-04-28 05:32:56 | Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey |
| Previous Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2016-04-28 04:22:44 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |