From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: minor comments issue in ResultRelInfo src/include/nodes/execnodes.h |
Date: | 2024-08-12 10:32:22 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvpfSi7kZDLPPXYHP2xfTn9Hgnu2tvawtK2z_Mxhj4hNPg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 22:03, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> AttrNumber ri_RowIdAttNo;
>
> /* arrays of stored generated columns expr states, for INSERT and UPDATE */
> ExprState **ri_GeneratedExprsI;
> ExprState **ri_GeneratedExprsU;
> }
> for the struct ResultRelInfo, i've checked the above fields.
>
> I think first ri_RowIdAttNo applies to MERGE also. so the comments may
> not be correct?
Yeah, ri_RowIdAttNo is used for MERGE. We should fix that comment.
> Other files comments are fine.
I'd say ri_GeneratedExprsI and ri_GeneratedExprsU are also used for
MERGE and the comment for those is also outdated. See:
ExecMergeMatched -> ExecUpdateAct -> ExecUpdatePrepareSlot ->
ExecComputeStoredGenerated(..., CMD_UPDATE)
ExecMergeNotMatched -> ExecInsert -> ExecComputeStoredGenerated(..., CMD_INSERT)
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jian he | 2024-08-12 10:33:13 | Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping |
Previous Message | Arseny Sher | 2024-08-12 10:13:19 | Re: Taking into account syncrep position in flush_lsn reported by apply worker |