From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error code for checksum failure in origin.c |
Date: | 2021-08-27 04:32:26 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JS_fDvrTRJuFy7wQADZaKmaNGFC3na4wXQUWhfHhyj=w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 4:11 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Aug 2021, at 12:03, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 3:18 PM Kasahara Tatsuhito
> > <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> In the code in src/backend/replication/logical/origin.c,
> >> the error code "ERRCODE_CONFIGURATION_LIMIT_EXCEEDED" is given
> >> when a checksum check results in an error,
> >> but "ERRCODE_ DATA_CORRUPTED" seems to be more appropriate.
> >>
> >
> > +1. Your observation looks correct to me and the error code suggested
> > by you seems appropriate. We use ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED in
> > ReadTwoPhaseFile() for similar error.
>
> Agreed, +1 for changing this.
>
I think we need to backpatch this till 9.6 as this is introduced by
commit 5aa2350426. Any objections to that?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-08-27 04:36:48 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-08-27 04:04:00 | Re: [PATCH] Tab completion for ALTER TABLE … ADD … |