From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |
Date: | 2022-02-06 15:21:24 |
Message-ID: | 8b6df28a-7289-a449-9680-8fc06ad58dd0@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
If you can't find it in the documentation, then dba.stackexchange would be
the place to ask.
On 2/6/22 7:43 AM, Goti wrote:
> Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this
> info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this. Does that mean that I
> should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here?
> Please correct me if I am wrong!
> Thanks,
>
> Goti
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
> >
> > Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal
> buffers
> > or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would
> like to
> > understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> > change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.
>
> It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should
> ask Amazon,
> not us.
>
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Deepak Trika | 2022-02-06 17:41:51 | regarding remote connection |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-06 14:29:33 | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |