Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?
Date: 2022-02-06 15:21:24
Message-ID: 8b6df28a-7289-a449-9680-8fc06ad58dd0@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

If you can't find it in the documentation, then dba.stackexchange would be
the place to ask.

On 2/6/22 7:43 AM, Goti wrote:
> Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this
> info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this. Does that mean that I
> should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here?
> Please correct me if I am wrong!
> Thanks,
>
> Goti
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
> >
> > Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal
> buffers
> > or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would
> like to
> > understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> > change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.
>
> It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should
> ask Amazon,
> not us.
>

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Deepak Trika 2022-02-06 17:41:51 regarding remote connection
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-02-06 14:29:33 Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers?