From: | Goti <aryan(dot)goti(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |
Date: | 2022-02-07 03:35:32 |
Message-ID: | CAOzfMuo7fp5wN-x7XVqrqF_UErvCGt83vpa0ks++cC6wkcfEdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks a lot Dan , Julien and Ron for your inputs.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 8:51 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If you can't find it in the documentation, then dba.stackexchange would be
> the place to ask.
>
>
> On 2/6/22 7:43 AM, Goti wrote:
>
> Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this
> info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this. Does that mean that I
> should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here?
> Please correct me if I am wrong!
> Thanks,
>
> Goti
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
>> >
>> > Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal
>> buffers
>> > or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would like
>> to
>> > understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
>> > change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.
>>
>> It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should ask
>> Amazon,
>> not us.
>>
>
> --
> Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
>
--
Thanks,
Goti
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Pang (chaolpan) | 2022-02-07 08:43:39 | autovacuum default run with vacuum_index_cleanup and vacuum_truncate and related lock? |
Previous Message | Vijaykumar Jain | 2022-02-06 19:40:50 | Re: restarting logical replication after upgrading standby |