| From: | Goti <aryan(dot)goti(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |
| Date: | 2022-02-06 13:43:42 |
| Message-ID: | CAOzfMuoA=16216dHM0+dtHdgZbZHTz6LHLRu_RyzVX6+5CtO9Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Sure Julien. I will ask Amazon too. My intention was just to gather this
info IN CASE if someone has already an idea on this. Does that mean that I
should not be posting Aurora postgres related questions/ doubts here?
Please correct me if I am wrong!
Thanks,
Goti
On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 6:55 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2022 at 05:24:37PM +0530, Goti wrote:
> >
> > Can someone shed some light as to whether aurora postgres uses wal
> buffers
> > or not? Given the way the writes are handled differently, I would like to
> > understand the same while it is being said in the documentation not to
> > change the parameter from the default value of 16MB.
>
> It's unlikely that any one here can answer the question. You should ask
> Amazon,
> not us.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Smith | 2022-02-06 14:11:15 | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-06 13:25:09 | Re: Does aurora PostgreSQL use wal_buffers? |