| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
| Cc: | postgresql advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2004-06-05 16:43:22 |
| Message-ID: | 88D0AEE2-0868-415A-B35A-67931D4699E7@mimectl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
From: David Garamond
Sent: Sat 6/5/2004 9:28 AM
Cc: postgresql advocacy; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year),
then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to
8.0 now, then we have up until 2023.
Hi Dave,
I might be missing the point, but why can't we go to double figures? MS Office has, HP-UX has, OS-X, Norton AV has, Madrake Linux has...
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Carlos Eduardo Smanioto | 2004-06-05 18:55:32 | [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL Database |
| Previous Message | Markus Bertheau | 2004-06-05 13:20:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-05 16:57:27 | I/O support for composite types |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-05 14:13:48 | Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 |