| From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
| Cc: | postgresql advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2004-06-05 13:20:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1086441641.2825.0.camel@teetnang |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
В Сбт, 05.06.2004, в 10:28, David Garamond пишет:
> This probably has been discussed and is probably a very minor point, but
> consider how many more years we want to be able to use the <single
> digit>.<single digit> major release numbering.
>
> Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year),
> then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to
> 8.0 now, then we have up until 2023.
>
> Also we have 1 more chance to skip major number: 8.x -> 9.0. Imagine
> what features will there be in 9.0 that is ground-breaking enough.
> Because after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into
> without going into 2 digits.
What's the problem with 7.10?
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-06-05 16:43:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | David Garamond | 2004-06-05 08:28:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-06-05 14:13:48 | Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-06-05 10:38:37 | Re: Tablespaces |