Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>
To:
Cc: postgresql advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2004-06-05 08:28:25
Message-ID: 40C18429.2010508@zara.6.isreserved.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

This probably has been discussed and is probably a very minor point, but
consider how many more years we want to be able to use the <single
digit>.<single digit> major release numbering.

Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year),
then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to
8.0 now, then we have up until 2023.

Also we have 1 more chance to skip major number: 8.x -> 9.0. Imagine
what features will there be in 9.0 that is ground-breaking enough.
Because after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into
without going into 2 digits.

I personally don't see the major number as a very magical thing. Look at
Linux for example. People still see 2.6 as very different/ahead compared
to 2.4...

--
dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Bertheau 2004-06-05 13:20:41 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Evan Rempel 2004-06-05 06:00:04 Re: PostgreSQL certifications?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-06-05 10:38:37 Re: Tablespaces
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-05 04:57:42 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?