From: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | postgresql advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Date: | 2004-06-05 08:28:25 |
Message-ID: | 40C18429.2010508@zara.6.isreserved.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
This probably has been discussed and is probably a very minor point, but
consider how many more years we want to be able to use the <single
digit>.<single digit> major release numbering.
Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year),
then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to
8.0 now, then we have up until 2023.
Also we have 1 more chance to skip major number: 8.x -> 9.0. Imagine
what features will there be in 9.0 that is ground-breaking enough.
Because after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into
without going into 2 digits.
I personally don't see the major number as a very magical thing. Look at
Linux for example. People still see 2.6 as very different/ahead compared
to 2.4...
--
dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2004-06-05 13:20:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Previous Message | Evan Rempel | 2004-06-05 06:00:04 | Re: PostgreSQL certifications? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-06-05 10:38:37 | Re: Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-05 04:57:42 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? |