[OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL Database

From:	"Carlos Eduardo Smanioto" <csmanioto(at)uol(dot)com(dot)br>
To:	<pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	[OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL Database
Date:	2004-06-05 18:55:32
Message-ID:	034d01c44b2e$ae9b2b00$cf00a8c0@smannote
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2004-06-05 18:55:32 from "Carlos Eduardo Smanioto" <csmanioto(at)uol(dot)com(dot)br>  2004-05-05 21:11:29 from "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com>   2004-05-06 01:48:30 from Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>    2004-05-06 08:13:10 from Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>     2004-05-06 08:43:25 from Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>      2004-05-06 22:29:11 from Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>     2004-05-06 13:47:08 from Don Vaillancourt <donv(at)webimpact(dot)com>      2004-05-07 23:35:44 from Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>  2004-05-05 21:23:03 from "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

Responses

• Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL at 2004-05-05 21:11:29 from J. Andrew Rogers
• Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL at 2004-05-05 21:23:03 from scott.marlowe

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	David Garamond	2004-06-05 20:11:02	Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message	Dave Page	2004-06-05 16:43:22	Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Laurent Martelli	2004-06-05 19:01:29	Re: Unused table of view
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2004-06-05 17:36:30	Re: Unused table of view