Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL

From: "J(dot) Andrew Rogers" <jrogers(at)neopolitan(dot)com>
To: Carlos Eduardo Smanioto <csmanioto(at)uol(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-05-05 21:11:29
Message-ID: 1083791489.11496.23.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 11:55, Carlos Eduardo Smanioto wrote:
> What's the case of bigger database PostgreSQL (so greate and amount of
> registers) that they know???

You might want to fix the month on your system time.

With respect to how big PostgreSQL databases can get in practice, these
are our two biggest implementations:

- 0.5 Tb GIS database (this maybe upwards of 600-700Gb now, I didn't
check)

- 10 Gb OLTP system with 70 million rows and a typical working set of
2-3 Gb.

Postgres is definitely capable of handling large pretty databases with
ease. There are some narrow types of workloads that it doesn't do so
well on, but for many normal DBMS loads it scales quite well.

j. andrew rogers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-05-05 21:23:03 Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2004-05-05 20:21:41 Re: Prestige users

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2004-05-05 21:23:03 Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
Previous Message Paul Tuckfield 2004-05-05 18:13:11 Re: very high CPU usage in "top", but not in "mpstat"