From: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: synchronous_standby_name format |
Date: | 2017-07-14 15:56:33 |
Message-ID: | 87shhz9fm6.fsf@jsievers.enova.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to make our setup a little more secure. So, I thought
> I would restrict which servers could replicate from our primary.
> However, it does not appear that 9.6.3 can use a FQDN entry for this
> parameter. Plus, our hostnames include "-" characters, and that seems
> to break the system as well. Shouldn't synchronous_standby_names
> accept a FQDN with a dot or a dash in the hostname or is this maybe a
> bug? (Flame suit on)
HBA file is where you restrict access based on IP/netmask or DNS names.
synchronous_standby_names has nothing whatsoever to do with this.
HTH
> --
> Jay
>
>
--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres(dot)consulting(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 312.241.7800
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Scalia | 2017-07-14 16:34:56 | Re: synchronous_standby_name format |
Previous Message | Ashish Tiwari | 2017-07-14 15:36:10 | Re: synchronous_standby_name format |