From: | Ashish Tiwari <tashish786(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: synchronous_standby_name format |
Date: | 2017-07-14 15:36:10 |
Message-ID: | CAH8UkmFerwi52Ars5jF8PQq-bp1SeWjV01S=3w1CmEWBXYs1fw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hi John,
Please refer the below links . This may help you.
https://googleweblight.com/i?u=https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/auth-pg-hba-conf.html&grqid=FSXUA_9A&hl=en-IN
Thanks.
On Jul 14, 2017 8:29 PM, "John Scalia" <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to make our setup a little more secure. So, I thought I
> would restrict which servers could replicate from our primary. However, it
> does not appear that 9.6.3 can use a FQDN entry for this parameter. Plus,
> our hostnames include "-" characters, and that seems to break the system as
> well. Shouldn't synchronous_standby_names accept a FQDN with a dot or a
> dash in the hostname or is this maybe a bug? (Flame suit on)
> --
> Jay
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry Sievers | 2017-07-14 15:56:33 | Re: synchronous_standby_name format |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2017-07-14 14:58:48 | synchronous_standby_name format |