Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
Date: 1999-07-10 21:51:00
Message-ID: 8768.931643460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
>> I'm seeing no problem with cvs sources from yesterday evening. I think
>> you must have a corrupted copy of one of the files --- not heapam.h,
>> evidently, but maybe something it depends on. Try removing and
>> refetching everything that was pulled by your last cvs run.

> Still no luck :-( I did fresh cvs checkout.

I just did one too, and diffed it against what I had before.
There's still nothing that looks broken.

After looking again at your message, I wonder whether the rest of us
are chasing the wrong idea. The message you sent looked to be corrupted
text, because it mentioned '^Time_t' and so forth. But now I wonder
whether that error wasn't just in your cutting and pasting of the
error message. If we take the messages at face value they seem to
indicate that type time_t is not known to the compiler when it processes
heapam.h, which would make sense if <time.h> hasn't been included yet.

And, right offhand, I'm not seeing where <time.h> gets included before
heapam.h is read.

Has anyone changed anything that might affect where <time.h> gets
included? Perhaps this is a configuration problem.

Oleg, how long ago did you last pull a working fileset?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-07-10 22:16:01 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-07-10 21:18:28 Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT question