From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 |
Date: | 1999-07-10 21:51:00 |
Message-ID: | 8768.931643460@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
>> I'm seeing no problem with cvs sources from yesterday evening. I think
>> you must have a corrupted copy of one of the files --- not heapam.h,
>> evidently, but maybe something it depends on. Try removing and
>> refetching everything that was pulled by your last cvs run.
> Still no luck :-( I did fresh cvs checkout.
I just did one too, and diffed it against what I had before.
There's still nothing that looks broken.
After looking again at your message, I wonder whether the rest of us
are chasing the wrong idea. The message you sent looked to be corrupted
text, because it mentioned '^Time_t' and so forth. But now I wonder
whether that error wasn't just in your cutting and pasting of the
error message. If we take the messages at face value they seem to
indicate that type time_t is not known to the compiler when it processes
heapam.h, which would make sense if <time.h> hasn't been included yet.
And, right offhand, I'm not seeing where <time.h> gets included before
heapam.h is read.
Has anyone changed anything that might affect where <time.h> gets
included? Perhaps this is a configuration problem.
Oleg, how long ago did you last pull a working fileset?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-10 22:16:01 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-10 21:18:28 | Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT question |