From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 |
Date: | 1999-07-11 05:57:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.990711095235.2043U-100000@ra |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 17:51:00 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
> Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
> PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
>
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> >> I'm seeing no problem with cvs sources from yesterday evening. I think
> >> you must have a corrupted copy of one of the files --- not heapam.h,
> >> evidently, but maybe something it depends on. Try removing and
> >> refetching everything that was pulled by your last cvs run.
>
> > Still no luck :-( I did fresh cvs checkout.
>
> I just did one too, and diffed it against what I had before.
> There's still nothing that looks broken.
>
> After looking again at your message, I wonder whether the rest of us
> are chasing the wrong idea. The message you sent looked to be corrupted
> text, because it mentioned '^Time_t' and so forth. But now I wonder
> whether that error wasn't just in your cutting and pasting of the
> error message. If we take the messages at face value they seem to
Ooh, soorry. This is known problem (at least for me) with cut-n-paste
in xterm !
> indicate that type time_t is not known to the compiler when it processes
> heapam.h, which would make sense if <time.h> hasn't been included yet.
>
Sure, something is broken in configure
> And, right offhand, I'm not seeing where <time.h> gets included before
> heapam.h is read.
>
> Has anyone changed anything that might affect where <time.h> gets
> included? Perhaps this is a configuration problem.
>
> Oleg, how long ago did you last pull a working fileset?
First time I noticed the problem was about 2 weeks ago.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-07-11 06:09:24 | Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT question |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-11 03:57:51 | 6.5.1 release date |