Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1

From: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
Date: 1999-07-11 05:57:03
Message-ID: Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.990711095235.2043U-100000@ra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 10 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 17:51:00 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
> Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
> PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
>
> Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> >> I'm seeing no problem with cvs sources from yesterday evening. I think
> >> you must have a corrupted copy of one of the files --- not heapam.h,
> >> evidently, but maybe something it depends on. Try removing and
> >> refetching everything that was pulled by your last cvs run.
>
> > Still no luck :-( I did fresh cvs checkout.
>
> I just did one too, and diffed it against what I had before.
> There's still nothing that looks broken.
>
> After looking again at your message, I wonder whether the rest of us
> are chasing the wrong idea. The message you sent looked to be corrupted
> text, because it mentioned '^Time_t' and so forth. But now I wonder
> whether that error wasn't just in your cutting and pasting of the
> error message. If we take the messages at face value they seem to

Ooh, soorry. This is known problem (at least for me) with cut-n-paste
in xterm !

> indicate that type time_t is not known to the compiler when it processes
> heapam.h, which would make sense if <time.h> hasn't been included yet.
>

Sure, something is broken in configure

> And, right offhand, I'm not seeing where <time.h> gets included before
> heapam.h is read.
>
> Has anyone changed anything that might affect where <time.h> gets
> included? Perhaps this is a configuration problem.
>
> Oleg, how long ago did you last pull a working fileset?

First time I noticed the problem was about 2 weeks ago.

>
> regards, tom lane
>

_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-07-11 06:09:24 Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT question
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-11 03:57:51 6.5.1 release date