Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-27 02:08:32
Message-ID: 8765dtjmu7.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user
> off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up
> using.

Uh, why not? (And more to the point, why raise the barrier to entry on
reporting bugs?)

Individuals can already post to pgsql-bugs "off the street", and it is
not much of a problem. Invalid bug reports can easily be marked as
such.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-02-27 02:13:36 Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 01:50:11 Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 03:57:46 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-26 23:57:05 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 03:57:46 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-26 23:57:05 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 03:57:46 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-26 23:57:05 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal