| From: | Cott Lang <cott(at)internetstaff(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-02-27 03:57:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1077854266.4360.5.camel@blackbox |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Perhaps when BZ supports PG - some progress is being made on that front,
> but it's not a done deal yet.
Redhat puts out a PG version of Bugzilla. It works pretty well.
However, we just dropped it in favor of Jira.
Jira is a lot friendlier for the less technically adept, and IIRC, it's
free for open source projects. It's not enough to have something that
can track bugs; you have to have something that people are willing to
use. :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cott Lang | 2004-02-27 04:01:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-02-27 03:56:11 | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cott Lang | 2004-02-27 04:01:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cott Lang | 2004-02-27 04:01:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cott Lang | 2004-02-27 04:01:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |