Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Date: 2004-02-27 02:13:36
Message-ID: 871xohjmlr.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Damn, yeah, you're right. Neil was going to code something so that
> "WITH UPDATE" would automatically translate into the creation of 2-3
> rules. But he got distracted ...

Indeed, the tragedy of being unable to work on PG full time :-)

But it hardly matters to the subject at hand: as I mentioned on IRC,
AFAIK there is *plenty* of stuff in SQL92 we don't support.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2004-02-27 02:45:42 Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-02-27 02:08:32 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal