From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Date: | 2004-02-26 23:57:05 |
Message-ID: | 403E87D1.2000202@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>>The question is, do we need BZ right off or should we try GForge's
>>lightweight tool first? Personally I find that BZ is a little
>>intimidating to new users, particularly for searching on issues; as a
>>result it tends to lead to a lot of duplicate filings.
>>
>>
>
>I think we had previously decided that we will not allow a random user
>off the street to file bug reports into whatever system we end up
>using. I see it primarily as a bug *tracking* system, not a bug
>*reporting* system.
>
>
>
I don't recall that there was a consensus about that. The difference
between BZ's "unconfirmed" and "new" states is that the latter means it
has been triaged. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/bug_status.html .
I certainly don't think we should impose such a restrictive rule on
every project that we might host on a GForge installation.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 01:50:11 | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-02-26 23:20:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-02-26 23:20:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-02-26 23:20:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-02-26 23:20:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |