Re: Is translating server messages really worth it?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgsql-translators(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is translating server messages really worth it?
Date: 2023-09-27 15:32:02
Message-ID: 806febc7-32d5-c777-9b21-fb471f977d37@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-translators

On 25.09.23 20:45, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> So, yeah, I'm kinda wondering if it makes sense to translate server
> messages. For client tools, such as psql or pg_dump or vacuumdb, it
> definitely makes sense. But the server logs? I pretty much don't know.
> It's a lot of work, with some nearly-impossible-to-translate messages.
>
> Anyway, I was wondering how you feel about this.

I think it would be good if we could prioritize messages somehow. I
think there'd be a lot of value with, like, the most important 500
messages in the server.

I have no idea how to arrange that.

> And I have another question, quite a bit related :) If a file (let's say
> psql-fr.po) is not translated at 80%, it's not distributed. But I was
> wondering if it was only this file (psql-fr.po) or all the files for
> this language? I'm considering leaving the postgres-fr.po file without
> any translation, but keep the other files up to date.

For the record, this is per file.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-translators by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-09-28 12:23:21 Re: Is translating server messages really worth it?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-09-27 15:28:42 Re: Is translating server messages really worth it?