From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | milimeter(at)163(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Date: | 2003-04-15 14:17:27 |
Message-ID: | 7808.1050416247@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> That seems like a rather poor excuse for not supporting a standard feature
> that people seem to ask about every week.
Actually, that was the first complaint that I can recall hearing in
quite some time.
I think this is simply a place where the spec got it wrong, and we
should agree to disagree, as we have done with identifier case-folding
for example ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-15 14:19:11 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:03:19 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ulli Mueckstein | 2003-04-15 14:18:27 | call analyze from stored procedure in C |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:03:19 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-15 20:36:52 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:29 | qualified column names |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barry Lind | 2003-04-15 15:52:02 | Re: the build |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:29 | qualified column names |