| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | milimeter(at)163(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
| Date: | 2003-04-15 14:17:27 |
| Message-ID: | 7808.1050416247@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> That seems like a rather poor excuse for not supporting a standard feature
> that people seem to ask about every week.
Actually, that was the first complaint that I can recall hearing in
quite some time.
I think this is simply a place where the spec got it wrong, and we
should agree to disagree, as we have done with identifier case-folding
for example ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-04-15 14:19:11 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:03:19 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ulli Mueckstein | 2003-04-15 14:18:27 | call analyze from stored procedure in C |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:03:19 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-15 20:36:52 | Re: More thoughts about FE/BE protocol |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:29 | qualified column names |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2003-04-15 15:52:02 | Re: the build |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:29 | qualified column names |