Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: milimeter(at)163(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias
Date: 2003-04-16 13:46:36
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.44.0304160142100.3722-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane writes:

> I think this is simply a place where the spec got it wrong, and we
> should agree to disagree, as we have done with identifier case-folding
> for example ...

That is not at all the same situation. The identifier-case folding goes
back to an unconscious design decision years ago and changing it now would
break everything. Allowing column aliases without AS would break nothing.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message greg 2003-04-16 13:51:28 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-04-16 12:26:27 Re: calculating time

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message greg 2003-04-16 13:51:28 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-04-16 13:13:33 One more question regarding dblink

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-16 14:06:07 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments
Previous Message Jason M. Felice 2003-04-16 13:12:50 Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-04-16 14:16:49 Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias
Previous Message Nic Ferrier 2003-04-16 12:41:22 Re: [PATCHES] the build