From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | milimeter(at)163(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Date: | 2003-04-16 13:46:36 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0304160142100.3722-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane writes:
> I think this is simply a place where the spec got it wrong, and we
> should agree to disagree, as we have done with identifier case-folding
> for example ...
That is not at all the same situation. The identifier-case folding goes
back to an unconscious design decision years ago and changing it now would
break everything. Allowing column aliases without AS would break nothing.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | greg | 2003-04-16 13:51:28 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-04-16 12:26:27 | Re: calculating time |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | greg | 2003-04-16 13:51:28 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-04-16 13:13:33 | One more question regarding dblink |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-16 14:06:07 | Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments |
Previous Message | Jason M. Felice | 2003-04-16 13:12:50 | Re: [INTERFACES] First draft of new FE/BE protocol spec posted for comments |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-16 14:16:49 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Previous Message | Nic Ferrier | 2003-04-16 12:41:22 | Re: [PATCHES] the build |