From: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | qualified column names |
Date: | 2003-04-15 13:40:29 |
Message-ID: | 1050414029.1790.414.camel@inspiron.cramers |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc |
jdbc and I suspect odbc have a requirement to return the table, and
schema of a column in a result set.
for jdbc at least a possible solution is to return
schema.table.column for each column returned. This could be turned
off/on using GUC variable.
functions, and computed fields can just return the column name as they
don't belong to a schema or table.
Does anyone have any other requirments?
--
Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cramer Consulting
--
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 13:43:53 | Re: Two 'identical' DB's not acting identically |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:12 | qualified column names |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:03:19 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:12 | qualified column names |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:17:27 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:12 | qualified column names |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 14:17:27 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:40:12 | qualified column names |