From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | milimeter(at)163(dot)com, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
Date: | 2003-04-15 13:24:11 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0304151046520.1750-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces pgsql-jdbc |
Tom Lane writes:
> I think it would be a bad idea in any case; it would mask errors too
> easily. For example, you meant to say "SELECT a + b, ..." but wrote
> "SELECT a b, ...". Or how about this:
> SELECT 'foo'::character varying
> Is "varying" an alias or part of the type name?
That seems like a rather poor excuse for not supporting a standard feature
that people seem to ask about every week. If someone can't tell the
difference between a and a + b he's going to have more problems than this.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jay O'Connor | 2003-04-15 13:36:51 | Appending to an array |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-04-15 13:18:46 | Re: [GENERAL] Are we losing momentum? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:38:46 | qualified column names |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-04-15 13:18:46 | Re: [GENERAL] Are we losing momentum? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:38:46 | qualified column names |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 05:49:26 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem about pgsql's column alias |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-04-15 13:38:46 | qualified column names |
Previous Message | Nic Ferrier | 2003-04-15 11:33:14 | Re: the build |