| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 18:36:32 |
| Message-ID: | 57361EB0.9090607@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/13/2016 11:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Josh berkus wrote:
>
>> Anyway, can we come up with a consensus of some minimum changes it will
>> take to make the next version 10.0?
>
> I think the next version should be 10.0 no matter what changes we put
> in.
>
Well, if we adopt 2-part version numbers, it will be. Maybe that's the
easiest thing? Then we never have to have this discussion again, which
certainly appeals to me ...
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2016-05-13 18:36:46 | Re: 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-05-13 18:35:43 | Re: 10.0 |